Coordination Type

Follow

Helen Arnold

• 16 November 2016 02:56

Is there any scope to increase the number of coordination types? It would benefit us to have another type available that we can customise to suit our needs.  

4

• 

  Jade Steffensen

  • 16 November 2016 03:53

  Hi Helen, can I ask for some examples as to how you might use/customise additional coordination types?

  0

  Comment actions Permalink
• 

  Helen Arnold

  • 16 November 2016 03:58

  Hi Jade,

  We have two types of clients that we deliver in-house courses to. We label them 'contract' and 'do and charge'. At the moment they are all going under the one coordination type but if we had an additional type we could do better reporting and set up workflows.

  0

  Comment actions Permalink
• 

  Jade Steffensen

  • 16 November 2016 05:54

  Hi Helen,

  Thanks for providing this additional clarification. Currently, course Workflows can be actioned for specific client organisations, however, this could be difficult to manage with large numbers of clients. It would be great to hear from any other clients that may have a similar requirement.

  0

  Comment actions Permalink
• 

  Helen Arnold

  • 16 November 2016 23:27

  Thanks Jade. I am aware of the client organisation trigger but we have too many clients to use that efficiently. It would really help us to make better use of workflow if we could have a different coordination type.

  0

  Comment actions Permalink
• 

  Mirko Mujica

  • 28 March 2017 01:34

  Hi Jade, 

  
  We also would benefit from this. 

  
  We have multiple clients that we deliver in-house courses to. The manual labeling is also the only way to decipher the different Client types.

  Currently the limitation I don't think is the Coordination Type but if we had an additional category type we could do better reporting and set up workflows.

  
  A 'Sub-Category' in Workshops would help in achieving this. 

  e.g. Coordination Type: in-house

  Sub-Category: Contract A

  e.g. Coordination Type: in-house

  Sub-Category: Contract B

  
  Making this Sub-Category available at the aXc Workshop level and in the Workflow Engine Conditions would help us tremendously.

  
  Regards

  Mirko

  0

  Comment actions Permalink
• 

  Helen Arnold

  • 28 March 2017 01:42

  Would it be possible to add organisation category to the workflow conditions? That way we could have coordination type 'in-house' and org category 'contract' and then we could run the work flows how we want to

  0

  Comment actions Permalink
• 

  Jade Steffensen

  • 28 March 2017 02:24

  Hi Mirko and Helen, thanks for the input on this idea. The ability to trigger workflows based on a client organisation category sounds like a great idea that would be easier to implement than adding additional coordination types or sub-categories. Please remember to vote on these ideas, as we currently have over 500 ideas logged!

  0

  Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.