Agreements - Manual fields that the signee(s) can fill as they sign a document

Completed

Comments

7 comments

  • Official comment
    Jack Christensen

    Hi All,

    The ability for specific signatories to input information into documents before signing has been added in our most recent release.

    https://support.axcelerate.com.au/hc/en-gb/articles/8775927616783-Release-Notes-2024

    Thanks,
    Jack

    Comment actions Permalink
  • Sheeny Byrne

    Great idea!

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Liz Pilkington

    That would be very useful - especially if they can be allocated to specific signees (thanks Andrew)!

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • James Richards

    Hi Andrew,

    I think the feature you are after already exists. In the template fields that appear to the right of screen when creating the agreement, their is a manual creation option. Give the field a label and choose what type of input you want, text area, checkbox etc

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Pip Austin

    I tested that one and it looks like it is a manual field for the axcelerate user to add text into and not for the signee(s). I plan to keep testing but so far I think I can only add a signature with a comment for a signee to fill in. I am happy to be wrong if there is something additional a signee can complete.

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Andrew Rowland

    Hi James, 

    Yes as Pip mentioned, the manual fields there are for axcelerate users to enter in information before sending the agreement, not for signee(s) to fill when they're signing the agreement. 

    As far as I can tell, the only way for the signee(s) to add any information at the moment is in the comment field attached to the signature. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Mark Gilmore

    Hi Everyone

    Thanks for the continued conversation & feedback.

    Enabling agreements to be more of a 'form' where Signees could submit information was initially part of our Agreements scope, however it was determined that this would have significantly increased the effort and meant a far longer development cycle for us to create the feature.

    Whilst this isn't currently on our immediate horizon, we'd love to revisit this in the future, so please continue to provide your feedback so we can prioritise accordingly.

    Cheers
    Mark

    1
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.